S.148A do not limit duty of AO to verify facts
The Bombay High Court in [2023] 458 ITR 486 (Bom) declined to admit the writ stating that the matter involved…
......Read MoreThe Bombay High Court in [2023] 458 ITR 486 (Bom) declined to admit the writ stating that the matter involved…
......Read MoreThe Delhi bench of ITAT in 107ITR( Trib) (SN) 93 encountered non-resident’s case reopening on irrelevant considerations. In the reasons…
......Read MoreIn [2023] 458 ITR 437 (SC) the dispute was whether the taxpayers are required to preserve records beyond 6 years.…
......Read MoreIn a new development the Telangana High Court set aside the notices issued u/s 148/148A and consequent orders passed by…
......Read MoreSection 68 provisions is most common to every income tax assessment where the AO could seek confirmation and explanation on…
......Read MoreThe income tax return once filed can be revised for any missing claims or deductions no later than three months…
......Read MoreThe Kerala High Court in Koduvayur Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner-Works Contract [WP(C) No. 21212 of 2023] dated 7 August 2023…
......Read MoreIn [2023] 456 ITR 709 (Del) the reasons to believe were provided to the taxpayer after a gap of one and…
......Read MoreIn (2023] 105 ITR (Trib) 610 (ITAT[Amrit]) the assessee claimed to have received excess sale consideration on sale of agricultural…
......Read MoreIn the previous system of reopening action the AO initiation solely on the basis of some information received from fellow officer…
......Read More