Finality cannot be disturbed in carrying out any rectification u/s154
The Kerala High Court in (2021) 18ITR-OL 459 stopped the AO from changing the method of computing deduction u/s 36(1)…
......Read MoreThe Kerala High Court in (2021) 18ITR-OL 459 stopped the AO from changing the method of computing deduction u/s 36(1)…
......Read MoreIn a high profile case @ 436 ITR 340 the department invoked actions under section 153C and 148 both of…
......Read MoreTo successfully manage reopening it is desirable for AO to meet the following four broad parameters : the conditions stipulated…
......Read MoreOnce a notice u/s 148 is issued within the period of limitation, jurisdiction becomes vested in the ITO to proceed…
......Read MorePassing assessment order before the appointed day and time without considering reply filed by the assessee would amount to an…
......Read MoreEven when the High Court in [2021] 435 ITR 533 (Mad) formed a view that the invocation of section 148/147…
......Read MoreEven when we are being critical of and debating the subject of the jurisdiction of the AO for procedural changes…
......Read MoreEven when we are debating on the subject of the jurisdiction of the AO for procedural changes brought by FA…
......Read MoreIn (2021] 433 ITR 48 (Mad) the assessee contractor followed the percentage of completion method of accounting for recognition of…
......Read MoreWhen it comes to reopening a case the Madras High Court in (2021] 17 ITR-OL 489 (Mad) recalled the Calcutta…
......Read More